🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the UK, and it appears it’s time for a rethink. Throughout its history, an observance that began as a festivity and recollection of the past, cultural identity and bonds between global Black communities, has adopted a business-like atmosphere, growing to encompass gatherings where African descendants are compensated to speak with Caucasian groups about implicit prejudice and active solidarity. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s generated a rise in the business of showcasing anti-racist commitment. Yet, that phase is now over. The surge has crested, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Background of Black History Month

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with a week of commemoration and observance in the second week of February. Black History Month evolved from this initiative and was publicly established in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the United States and Canada in the second month, but also in October in the UK, Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The month has evolved since its inception, giving reduced attention to the histories of transatlantic enslavement and struggles for equality, and greater focus on notable African descendants in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and broadly celebrating the impact Black people have made to shape the country. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the way the month is celebrated is a manifestation of the contemporary political context. How it progresses is a good lesson in how co-option leads to weakening: the restructuring of Black History Month has impeded the objective of it, which is to address embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how important it is to reconsider Black History Month as much as the particular moment in which it occurs this year. In the Britain, a reemerging right-wing in the shape of the Reform political group is leading the polls. In the recent season we saw the largest far-right rally in the history of Britain. the Conservative leader, the person of color at the helm of the Conservative party, is a staunch adversary of anti-racism activism, and we are in a situation where a legislator gains confidence to declare that the absence of Caucasian individuals in certain urban areas is a source of worry. Meanwhile, ultra-nationalist movements are expanding in Europe as a whole.

In the United States, a colossal assault against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been taken, frequently with success, to the supreme judicial bodies of the country. A drive to scrub Black history and experience from the records is ongoing. One of the political figure's first executive orders aimed at the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the Smithsonian Institution, claiming they of a organized and extensive campaign to rewrite our Nation’s history” by representing the nation “as naturally discriminatory”.

Against this backdrop, the celebration represents how little it can be impactful if it is limited to either dutiful corporate observances, or stripped of political content celebrations of contributions in the past, rather than addressing the realities of the contemporary world. It also demonstrates how its short period means that it is separated from the broader ongoing work that is required. A university professor, a educator at an educational institution, expressed it perfectly when she raised concerns about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The issue with adopting a symbolic stance”, she commented, “is that it often means that Black History Month becomes a transient display rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Determining how to adapt, revise and extend efforts for fair treatment and appreciation in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a challenging endeavor. There is a urge to just do away with events including Black History Month completely, believing they are inadequate for current needs, or are relics of an period that has failed to deliver.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and tradition of activism for racial justice – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, inclusion and equity efforts, and certainly, even commercial engagements – form an infrastructure that a significant effort has gone into. It is there not only to deteriorate as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, declines), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month appear as? Well, first, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is spread out across all seasons (as some institutions are already beginning to do), parts of its content (particularly around historic Black characters) integrated into academic syllabi. It would also be a period that does not avoid political issues, and leaves space for citizens, particularly the younger generation, to express their concerns and stories. What use is simple recognition of the history when it doesn’t reckon with the contemporary truth of far-right rallies in the urban areas? Organizations who mark it should not be comforted with the neutral terminology of “unconscious bias” and alertness to minor insults, but challenged by the threats that impact society if fight against prejudice is not approached earnestly. In short, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, critical, and responsive. It could be that an complete renaming is necessary – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.